Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim's avatar

Great analysis Rohan!!

Just one thing to add.

If we invert Timber from RB to DM (instead of moving Saliba into midfield), we would have also achieved the same 3-2 shape. And if the opponent DOESN’T FOLLOW Timber (or Saliba), Timber (or Saliba) would become the extra man in the midfield.

The difference is, moving Timber is asking questions on the opponent’s LEFT WINGER, whether he should follow or not follow. If he FOLLOWS Timber, Timber would drag him centrally, and the space that Timber ORIGINALLY OCCUPIED WOULD BE FREED WITH LOTS OF SPACES.

Whereas moving Saliba is asking questions on the opponent’s STRIKER. If he FOLLOWS Saliba, the space that Saliba ORIGINALLY OCCUPIED WOULD BE FREED WITH LOTS OF SPACES.

Jim's avatar

From Arteta’s words. The opponent’s press would aim to create a “man to man” situation.

So how do we avoid the “man to man” press? The answer is that we have to try to move the opponent players.

Imagine an imaginary scenario that all the opponent players would ALWAYS follow the players they are assigned to press. If our whole team all move to the corner flag, then the whole opponent team would also move to the corner flag.

This is how you move the opponent players.

If Saliba moves into the midfield, he would probably bring an opponent player with him (the one who is assigned to press him). Then the spaces that Saliba originally occupied, would be freed.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?